Directive No. 3025.18 Circumvents Posse Comitatus , Allows Obama To Use Military Against Citizens

Memo Outlines Obama’s Plan To Use The Military Against Citizens

 

 

 

 

” A 2010 Pentagon directive on military support to civilian authorities details what critics say is a troubling policy that envisions the Obama administration’s potential use of military force against Americans.

  The directive contains noncontroversial provisions on support to civilian fire and emergency services, special events and the domestic use of the Army Corps of Engineers.

  The troubling aspect of the directive outlines presidential authority for the use of military arms and forces, including unarmed drones, in operations against domestic unrest.”

 

 

 

 

“ This appears to be the latest step in the administration’s decision to use force within the United States against its citizens,” said a defense official opposed to the directive.

  Directive No. 3025.18, “Defense Support of Civil Authorities,” was issued Dec. 29, 2010, and states that U.S. commanders “are provided emergency authority under this directive.”

“ Federal military forces shall not be used to quell civil disturbances unless specifically authorized by the president in accordance with applicable law or permitted under emergency authority,” the directive states.”

” Military assistance can include loans of arms, ammunition, vessels and aircraft. The directive states clearly that it is for engaging civilians during times of unrest.

  A U.S. official said the Obama administration considered but rejected deploying military force under the directive during the recent standoff with Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy and his armed supporters.”

 

Story continues at Washington Times

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

—

A Message To The #Euromaidan From Bucharest

Romanians Offer Words Of Support To Euromaidan

 

 

Published on Feb 21, 2014

” Our hearts are with you.
Music: Yumisekai – World of Sorrow CC License”

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

—

Is Barack Obama An Imperial President? Well , Duh !

President Obama’s Use Of Executive Action To Get Around Congressional Gridlock Is Unparalleled In Modern Times, Some Scholars Say. But To Liberal Activists, He’s Not Going Far Enough.

 

 

 

 

” “We’ve got this Constitution, we’ve got this whole thing about separation of powers,” Obama continued. “So there is no shortcut to politics, and there’s no shortcut to democracy.”

  The reality isn’t so simple. Obama, a former constitutional law professor, was once skeptical of the aggressive use of presidential power. During the 2008 campaign, he accused President George W. Bush of regularly circumventing Congress. Yet as president, Obama has grown increasingly bold in his own use of executive action, at times to controversial effect.

  The president (or his administration) has unilaterally changed elements of the Affordable Care Act (ACA); declared an anti-gay-rights law unconstitutional; lifted the threat of deportation for an entire class of undocumented immigrants; bypassed Senate confirmation of controversial nominees; waived compliance requirements in education law; and altered the work requirements under welfare reform. This month, the Obama administration took the highly unusual step of announcing that it will recognize gay marriages performed in Utah – even though Utah itself says it will not recognize them while the issue is pending in court.

  Early in his presidency, Obama also expanded presidential warmaking powers, surveillance of the American public, and extrajudicial drone strikes on alleged terrorists outside the United States, including Americans – going beyond Mr. Bush’s own global war on terror following 9/11. But more recently, he has flexed his executive muscle more on domestic policy.”

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

—

Why We Need The 2nd Amendment

Why We Need The 2nd Amendment

 

 

Published on Dec 31, 2012

” If this video doesn’t explain to you why our founding fathers put the 2nd amendment in the constitution nothing will. The actions of the police in this video should make it clear we can’t depend on them to protect us. Let me quote Fidel Castro when we was trying to convince the Cuban people to let him disarm them. he said, “Guns, For What?” “We will protect you!” as soon as they had the guns Fidel Castro ordered his government to take total control of the country. The people quickly learned why he wanted to take the guns. don’t fool yourself into thinking it can’t happen here. Watch the video and you will see it already is. even the courts have ruled that the police are not required to protect us. As you see they have interpreted that and permission to abuse and murder us. Let your congressmen know, we need armed guards in the schools, not more gun control. We need the second amendment to protect ourselves from the government. that is what it was put there for, not for hunting or sporting. In fact you can’t even find the words hunting or sporting in the constitution.”

—-

Protests Heat Up in Turkey

Revolution Will Not be Televised, It Will Be Tweeted … And Youtubed

Taksim Square Protests: 13 Photos Showing Severity Of the Protests

Aerial View Of Taksim Square

” The mainstream media has yet to highlight the protests. Meanwhile, police brutality continues as over 900 people have been arrested and several have been killed.” 

Blood in the Streets Of Istanbul

” Here are thirteen pictures from Twitter that show why we should take offense with mainstream media for not covering what could become an historic event.”

—

Pentagon Unilaterally Grants Itself Authority Over ‘Civil Disturbances’

U.S. Military ‘Power Grab’ Goes Into Effect

 

 

 

 

” The manhunt for the Boston Marathon bombing suspects offered the nation a window into the stunning military-style capabilities of our local law enforcement agencies. For the past 30 years, police departments throughout the United States have benefitted from the government’s largesse in the form of military weaponry and training, incentives offered in the ongoing “War on Drugs.” For the average citizen watching events such as the intense pursuit of the Tsarnaev brothers on television, it would be difficult to discern between fully outfitted police SWAT teams and the military.

The lines blurred even further Monday as a new dynamic was introduced to the militarization of domestic law enforcement. By making a few subtle changes to a regulation in the U.S. Code titled“Defense Support of Civilian Law Enforcement Agencies” the military has quietly granted itself the ability to police the streets without obtaining prior local or state consent, upending a precedent that has been in place for more than two centuries.

The most objectionable aspect of the regulatory change is the inclusion of vague language that permits military intervention in the event of “civil disturbances.” According to the rule:

Federal military commanders have the authority, in extraordinary emergency circumstances where prior authorization by the President is impossible and duly constituted local authorities are unable to control the situation, to engage temporarily in activities that are necessary to quell large-scale, unexpected civil disturbances.

Bruce Afran, a civil liberties attorney and constitutional law professor at Rutgers University, calls the rule, “a wanton power grab by the military,” and says, “It’s quite shocking actually because it violates the long-standing presumption that the military is under civilian control.”

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

—

 

Pope Francis And Argentina’s “Dirty War”

 

Jorge Bergoglio’s Sinful Role In Argentina’s ‘Dirty War’

 

 

 

 

” From 1976 until 1983, Argentina was governed by a series of US-backed military dictators who ruled with iron fists and crushed the regime’s opponents, many of them students, trade unionists, journalists and leftists. Kidnapping, torture, murder by death squads and disappearances characterized this brutal ‘Dirty War,’ and many of the leading perpetrators, including two junta leaders and the military dictator Gen. Leopoldo Galtieri, were trained by the United States in kidnapping, torture, assassination and democracy suppression at the School of the Americans in Panama. As many as 30,000 people were killed or disappeared during this horrific period, and many children and babies were stolen from parents imprisoned in concentration camps or murdered by the regime.

“We have much to be sorry for,” Father Ruben Captianio told the New York Times in 2007. “The attitude of the Church was scandalously close to the dictatorship to such an extent that I would say it was of a sinful degree.”

A 1995 lawsuit filed by a human rights lawyer alleges that Bergoglio, who was leading the local Jesuit community by the time the military junta seized power in 1976, was involved in the kidnapping of two of his fellow Jesuit priests, Orlando Yorio and Francisco Jalics, who were tortured by navy personnel before being dumped in a field, drugged and semi-naked, five months later.Bergoglio was also silent in the wake of Father Angelelli’s assassination, even as other leading Argentine clergy condemned the murder. He was quick, however, to hail the slain priest as a “martyr” years later in more democratic times.

“History condemns him,” Fortunato Mallimacci, a former dean at the University of Buenos Aires, once said of Bergoglio. “It shows him to be opposed to all innovation in the church and above all, during the dictatorship, it shows he was very cozy with the dictatorship.”

Human rights attorney Myriam Bregman told the AP that “the dictatorship could not have operated [so brutally] without this key support.” “

 

Related articles

• Papal election stirs Argentina’s ‘dirty war’ past (foxnews.com)
• Will Francis’s role during Argentina’s ‘Dirty War’ come back to haunt him? (foreignpolicy.com)
• Cloud of Dirty War hangs over Pope Francis (news.com.au)
• Jorge Mario Bergoglio: Did Pope Francis I fail to stand up to Argentina’s brutal junta? (thisismoney.co.uk)
• A Subpoena For Pope Francis? (thebrokenelbow.com)
• Papal election stirs Argentina’s ‘dirty war’ past (sacbee.com)

 

 

 

—-

Welcome To The Gulag Comrades

Indefinite Military Detention Of US Citizens To Be Signed Into Law By Obama

 

 

 

” We’ve been trying to keep you aware of what has been taking place with the talks concerning the 2013 version of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA). We’ve covered the Feinstein amendment, which effectively did nothing, except to empower Congress to authorize the military at their whim to violate people’s 4th, 5th, and 6th Amendment rights. But now the talks are all done and the legislation is headed for Barack Obama’s desk to be signed into law soon, just as it was nearly one year ago today, including provision to use the military to indefinitely detain US citizens.”

 

 

 

Related articles

• Senate Approves Indefinite Military Detention of U.S. Citizens in U.S. (blacklistednews.com)
• Chris Hedges ~ The Final Battle (shiftfrequency.com)
• NDAA 2013: Drones, Permanent War And Indefinite Detention Without Charge Or Trial For American Citizens On American Soil (ironboltbruce.com)
• the killing fields … the holocaust … the red brigades … the gulag … could any of these slaughters have happened against an armed populace? … (wintersoldier2008.typepad.com)

” The Only Thing Left For Obama To Do Is Put All These Guys In Jail “

Round ‘Em Up … Dissenters To The Camps

 

 

 

 

” Belafonte’s comment reveals the true nature of the “progressive” – it differs little from that of the communist thug who has zero tolerance for any opposition. Belafonte’s mindset ultimately terminates in purges, “cultural revolutions,” and death camps.”

Pack Your Bags

LIST OF ALL FEMA CONCENTRATION CAMPS IN AMERICA REVEALED

 

November 28, 2012 – There over 800 prison camps in the United States, all fully operational and ready to receive prisoners. They are all staffed and even surrounded by full-time guards, but they are all empty.

These camps are to be operated by FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency) should Martial Law need to be implemented in the United States and all it would take is a presidential signature on a proclamation and the attorney general’s signature on a warrant to which a list of names is attached.

Related articles

• CBS News Admits FEMA Camps Are Real (itmakessenseblog.com)
• Slow Gradual Collection of Americans Into Fema Camps? (vaticproject.blogspot.com)
• U.s. Marine Drill Sergeant Boasts of What They Will Do to Civilians Under Martial Law in the Usa – Termination of Civilians (you)! (animalsclubfreedom.typepad.com)
• NYT on Hurricane Sandy: We’re Doomed Without FEMA and Big Government (animalsclubfreedom.typepad.com)
• Camp FEMA Update: “We Feel Like We’re In a Concentration Camp” (marketdailynews.com)

Noble Lie Producer Warns of False Flag Event to Save Obama Election

Agenda 21 UN Takeover Plans Revealed

DHS Source: “It’s Going Hot”- Obama False Flag Coming

Obama & The UN Declare Americans “Public Enemy” #1

UNliberty …. Freedom to Tax

  Yet another reason to destroy the UN .

   There is no greater threat to our individual liberties than the UN . If you think the federal government is out of control imagine an authority that is even less responsive to the voter .

  ” Just when you think you’ve identified and outmaneuvered the enemy in front of you, another one comes sneaking up from behind.

   Yes, I know… you’re all worried about the number of taxes in Obamacare and Taxmageddon coming in January. Perhaps you
think that by simply electing some new people you’ll be in the clear. Guess again. You’re living in the global economy now, so why not have some global taxes? Think I’m
kidding? How about a global tax on all financial transactions ? “

Everyone Knows . No Guns , No Criminals … Right ?

Despotism 101 : First ban the means of self-defense .

“Huh. A corruption-riddled dictatorial regime wants to deprive its citizens of the means of popular resistance. (Where, oh where in history have we seen this type of thing before?) I happen to believe that a government should always fear its people, but I can maybe understand why communist totalitarians might not be so into that idea.”